McLean v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
31 F. 501 · 1887
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1931
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wilson · Kavanagh v. . Wilson · Koehler v. . Adler · Hayden v. Manning · In re May
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a party is called as a witness by the opposite party, the latter is not bound by his general statement as to his motives or intention in a particular transaction, but may draw any inference from his testimony which the facts stated by the witness seem to justify.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Campbell v. Berryman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.