Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F.2d 1010

Docket No. 2831.

Collie v. Fergusson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1929-05-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1966

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1929-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jacob L. Morewitz, of Newport News, Va. (Percy Carmel, of Hampton, Va., on the brief), for appellants.

¶2D. Arthur Kelsey, of Norfolk, Va. (Kelsey & Jett, of Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for appellees J. S. Darling & Son, S. M. Sinclair, E. T. Lawson & Son, W. J. Williamson, and Johnson & Corkran.

¶3Before WADDILL, PARKER, and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We have duly consid-

¶6ered the questions arising upon the petition for appeal from the decree of the District Court filed in this -cause on September 4, 1928, and the conclusion reached by us is that the decree should be affirmed. And it appearing that the amounts found to be due appellants were withheld from them pending this appeal at the instance of appellees, although appellees did not appeal from the order allowing same, we think it but right that appellants be allowed interest for the time during which the amounts due them have been thus withheld, and that the costs on appeal be divided.

¶7Affirmed.

/31/f2d/1010 · .json · Public domain