Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F.2d 1021

Docket No. 2833.

United States v. Whitten

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1929-05-02

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1929-05-02

¶1A. W. Woodcock, U. S. Atty., and Stanley E. Hartman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Baltimore, Md.

¶2Edward J. Colgan, Jr., of Baltimore, Md. (Karr & Colgan and Francis Key Murray, all of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees.

¶3Before WADDILL, PARKER, and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5After careful consideration, we have reached the conclusion that *1022the judgment of the United States District Court appealed from is free from error prejudicial to the appellant, and that the same should be affirmed.

¶6Affirmed.

/31/f2d/1021 · .json · Public domain