Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F.2d 332

Docket No. 2761.

Morgan v. Eastern Transportation Co.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1929.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1929-01-14

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1955

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1929-01-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. L. Morewitz, of Newport News, Va. (Jesse L. Rosenberg, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

¶2George M. Lanning, of Norfolk, Va. (Baird, White & Lanning, of Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for appellees.

¶3Before PARKER and NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judges, and COLEMAN, District Judge.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We have carefully considered all of the questions raised by appellant, and we agree with the conclusions reached by the learned District Judge. It is not necessary that we again discuss the questions which he has so fully covered in his opinion. We do not think that libelant has established a ease entitling him to recover for maintenance and cure, nor do we think that there has been a refusal or neglect without sufficient cause to pay him wages due so - as to entitle him to recover double wages under section 4529 of the Revised Statutes (46 USCA § 596).

¶6Affirmed.

/31/f2d/332 · .json · Public domain