Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 F.2d 660 - In re Steffens

In re Steffens’s Empirical Analysis

31 F.2d 660 · 1929

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1946
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Skilton v. . Codington · Karst v. . Gane · Stephens v. . Perrine · In re Myers · In re Watts-Woodward Press, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The filing of conditional sale contracts * * * shall be valid for a period of three years only. * * * The validity of the filing may in each case be extended for successive additional periods of one year from the date of refiling by filing in the proper filing district a copy of the original contract within thirty days next preceding the expiration of each period, with a statement attached signed by the seller, showing that the contract is in force and the amount remaining to be paid thereon. * * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.