Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F.2d 74

Docket No. 8199.

Day v. United States

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1929.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1929-02-20

2 counsel of record

Relies on Day v. United States

Opinion by Thomas Charles Munger · Decided 1929-02-20

¶1Pratt P. Bacon, of Texarkana, Ark., for appellant.

¶2W. N. Ivie, Asst. U. S. Atty.y pf Ft. Smith, Ark. (S. S. Langley, U. S. Atty., of Ft. Smith, Ark., on the brief), for the United States.

¶3Before VAN VALKENBURGH and BOOTH, Circuit Judges, and MUNGER, District Judge.

¶4MUNGER, District Judge.

¶5Appellant was convicted of the offense of carrying on the business of a wholesale liquor dealer. *75The defendant was tried jointly with William Day under the indictment and the evidence referred to in the opinion filed herewith in the case of William Day v. United States, 31 F.(2d) 71. The alleged errors relied upon in this ease are the same as were urged in the appeal of William Day, and are not well taken for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, because the facts are substantially the same.

¶6The judgment will be affirmed.

/31/f2d/74 · .json · Public domain