Birsch v. Tumbleson’s Empirical Analysis
31 F.2d 811 · 1929
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2002
4 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Royall · In re Neagle · United States Kennedy v. Tyler · Boardman v. Toffey · Whitten v. Tomlinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“involved in uncertainty and the subject of conflicting testimony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morgan v. People
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.