Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 F.3d 347 - Shipes v. Trinity Industries

Shipes v. Trinity Industries’s Empirical Analysis

31 F.3d 347 · 1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
July 2009
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Bradley v. School Board of City of Richmond · Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital · Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation · White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Court [in Landgraf ] indicated that when a procedural matter has been properly decided under the old rule, and a new procedural rule is subsequently enacted while the ultimate resolution of the case is still pending, no reversal is required.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.