United States v. Graef’s Empirical Analysis
31 F.3d 362 · 1994
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2023
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Joseph v. United States · United States v. S.A. Empresa de Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense · Murphy v. Sullivan · Grynberg v. Danzig · United States v. Mills
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“such charge against that individual contained in such complaint shall be dismissed or otherwise dropped.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“arrest and the filing of an indictment or information. Consequently, it concluded that the arrest”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.