Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 F.3d 375 - Adams v. Metiva

Adams v. Metiva’s Empirical Analysis

31 F.3d 375 · 1994

Citation profile

407
cited by 407 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

88 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 407 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Vinyard v. Wilson (2002), Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc. (2003)

88 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

20801994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 407 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he question is whether any officer in the defendant's position, measured objectively, would have clearly understood that he was under an affirmative duty to have refrained from such conduct.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “objectively unreasonable in light of [the] clearly established constitutional right[ ].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.