United States v. Adeniji’s Empirical Analysis
31 F.3d 58 · 1994
Citation profile
40 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Salameh (1998), United States v. Miller (1997)
40 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952
Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Pelaes v. United States · Griffin v. United States · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“demonstrate that the untimely disclosure of the statement adversely affected some aspect of [the defendant's] trial strategy.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] violation of Rule 30 warrants reversal only...where the defendant can show that he was substantially misled in formulating his arguments or otherwise prejudiced.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“hear no evil” do not somehow magically invest him with the ability to “do no evil.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.