United States v. Sheahan’s Empirical Analysis
31 F.3d 595 · 1994
Citation profile
34 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably United States v. Karam (1994), United States v. Dickler (1995)
34 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 1346
Relies on United States v. Brandon · United States v. Galloway · United States v. Streeter · United States v. Goldblatt · United States v. Prendergast
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that were part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'common victims, common accomplices, common purposes or similar modus operandi.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A scheme violates § 1344(a) if the scheme is `a departure from fundamental honesty, moral uprightness, or fair play and candid dealings in the general life of the community. The bank fraud statute condemns schemes designed to deceive in order to obtain something of value.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.