Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 F.3d 628 - United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

31 F.3d 628 · 1994

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

59 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Ngure v. Ashcroft (2004), United States v. Jackson-Randolph (2002)

59 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

390199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322 · 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)

Relies on Bourjaily v. United States · Ratzlaf et Ux United States · Oklahoma v. New Mexico · Yamamoto v. United States · Wade v. Shook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A statement that simply informs a listener of the declarant's criminal activities is not made in furtherance of the conspiracy; instead, the statement must somehow advance the objective of the conspiracy.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only if no reasonable jury could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that [the defendants were] guilty of the charged offense[s].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that no substantial rights of the defendant were affected, and that the error had no, or only slight, influence on the verdict[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.