Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F.3d 66

Docket No. 2068, Docket 94-7332.

Chanoff v. United States Surgical Corp.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued July 21, 1994. Decided July 28, 1994.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-07-28

2 counsel of record

Relies on 857 F. Supp. 1011 - Chanoff v. United States Surgical Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-07-28

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2011

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

80199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from Judge Nevas's ruling granting defendants-appellees' Rule 12(b)(6) motion with respect to plaintiffs' claims of, inter alia, common law fraud and federal securities violations. We affirm.

Barbara Moses, New York City (Gregory A. Markel, Gary E. Weiss, Michael B. Carlinsky, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, New York City, Thomas J. Byrne, James T. Shearin, Pullman & Comley, Bridgeport, CT, of counsel), for appellants.

Dale A. Schreiber, New York City (Charles S. Sims, Lawrence S. Block, Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn, of counsel), for appellees.

Prior report: 857 F.Supp. 1011.

Before: WINTER, McLAUGHLIN, and JACOBS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.

/31/f3d/66 · .json · Public domain