Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 F.3d 73 - United States v. Gaind

United States v. Gaind’s Empirical Analysis

31 F.3d 73 · 1994

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
7
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably State v. Singh (2002), United States v. Williamson (1995)

17 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

1901994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. Carver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Asking a witness whether a previous witness who gave conflicting testimony is 'mistaken' highlights the objective conflict without requiring the witness to condemn the prior witness a purveyor of deliberate falsehood, i.e., a 'liar.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e note ... that defendants invoking Richter have not succeeded in obtaining reversal of their convictions when the starkly offensive prosecutorial delinquencies in Richter were not replicated”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he opposing witnesses in this case were former [employees of defendant's business], not government agents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.