Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 F.3d 753 - Davis v. Shalala

Davis v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

31 F.3d 753 · 1994

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
November 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Matthews v. Bowen · Roberts v. Heckler · Stout v. Shalala · Penn v. Sullivan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a treating physician's opinion is generally entitled to substantial weight,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is sufficient if it sets forth the impairments which are accepted as true by the ALJ.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not have an impairment or combination of impairments”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.