Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F.3d 812

Docket Nos. 91-56248, 91-56379 and 91-56289.

Subafilms Ltd

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • SUBAFILMS, LTD.; The Hearst Corp., Plaintiffs-counter-v.MGM-PATHE COMMUNICATIONS CO., fka MGM/UA Communications Co. and as United Artists Corporation; MGM/UA Home Video, Inc.; Warner Home Video, Inc.; Warner Bros. Inc., Defendants-counter-claimants-
  • SUBAFILMS, LTD.; The Hearst Corpv.MGM-PATHE COMMUNICATIONS CO., fka MGM/UA Communications Co. and as United Artists Corporation; MGM/UA Home Video, Inc.; Warner Home Video, Inc.; Warner Bros. Inc.; United Artists Corporation

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 26, 1994.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1995

Relies on Subafilms Ltd

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Before: D. W. NELSON, HALL, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this circuit's opinion in Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir.1994) (en banc).

/31/f3d/812 · .json · Public domain