Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 F.3d 907 - Taylor v. Js Stainer

Taylor v. Js Stainer’s Empirical Analysis

31 F.3d 907 · 1994

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
3
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably United States v. Manning (1995), Bean v. Calderon (1998)

10 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

450199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Wright v. West · In re Miller · Steffens v. Derwinski · Thomas v. Brewer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “through far-fetched, unsupported speculation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[When] the prosecution's theory is based on the premise that the defendant handled certain objects while committing the crime in question, the record must contain sufficient evidence from which the trier of fact could reasonably infer that the fingerprints were in fact impressed at that time and not at some earlier date.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.