Orjias v. Stevenson’s Empirical Analysis
31 F.3d 995 · 1994
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Jacobsen v. Deseret Book Co. (2002), Neuren v. Adduci, Mastriani, Meeks & Schill (1995)
33 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 7401 (Air Quality Act of 1967)
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Huddleston v. United States · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · In re Martin-Trigona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]otwithstanding Rule 37(c), the district court may be found to have abused its discretion if [its] exclusion of testimony results in fundamental unfairness in the trial of the case.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the issue previously decided is identical with the one presented in the action in question, (2) the prior action has been fully adjudicated on the merits, (3) the party against whom the doctrine is invoked was a party, or in privity with a party, to the prior adjudication, and (4) the party against whom the doctrine is raised had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'district court should consider prejudice or surprise to opposing party, ability of party to cure prejudice, likelihood of disruption, and moving party's bad faith or unwillingness to comply.' ") (citation omitted). For our purposes, then, even under Rule 37, "[t]he imposition of sanctions for abuse of discovery under Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 37 is a matter within the discretion of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.