Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F. App'x 263

Boyd v. Stouffer

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 27, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-03-27

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2002

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-03-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1George Beesley Boyd appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254*264(West 1994 & Supp.2001), and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Boyd v. Stouffer, No. CA-01-2564-S (D. Md. Aug. 29, 2001; filed Sept. 12, 2001 and entered Sept. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2DISMISSED.

/31/fappx/263 · .json · Public domain