Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F. App'x 827

Redman v. Conroy

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 29, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-03-29

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-03-29

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Joseph Mario Redman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Redman v. Conroy, No. CA-01-3410 (D.Md. Dec. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/31/fappx/827 · .json · Public domain