Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 F. Supp. 246

Judson v. Buckley

U.S. District Court

Decided January 20, 1940

U.S. District Court · decided 1940-01-20

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1958

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

Relies on American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co. · Cincinnati, H. & D. R. v. McKeen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1940-01-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HULBERT, District Judge.

¶1The issues raised by the plaintiff’s reply to the first and second counterclaims set forth in the answer of the defendant are such as entitled the defendant to a trial by jury as a matter of right. See Moore’s Federal Practice, vol. 3, § 38.02, page 3009; American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co., 260 U.S. 360, 43 S.Ct. 149, 67 L.Ed. 306; Cincinnati, H. & D. R. Co. v. McKeen, 7 Cir., 64 F. 36; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Burger, D.C., 27 F.Supp. S54.

¶2Plaintiff’s motion to strike out demand, conceded to have been timely served, denied and defendant’s motion granted. Settle order on two days’ notice unless consented to as to form.

/31/fsupp/246 · .json · Public domain