Kosnik v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 628 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Orloff v. Willoughby · Gilligan v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It would be damaging to shift the decision [as to the composition, training, equipping, and control of a military force] from trained military professionals to a non-specialist judiciary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.