Yoder v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate J Bosch Second National Bank of New Haven
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the disclosure would not have occurred without Plaintiff's mother's intervening act of opening and reading the medical records without authorization from the Defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“nothing on the outside of the envelope received in the Aro mail room indicated that it contained a confidential medical record,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.