Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 Ga. App. 163

Murrow v. Walden

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1923

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1923-11-15

Relies on Palmer Brick Co. v. Chenall · Lunsford, Maxwell & Co. v. Malsby & Avery · Johnson v. J. S. &. W. H. Latimer

Decided 1923-11-15

Bloodworth, J.

¶11. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is denied.

¶22. Under the facts of this case the judge did not err either in striking the plea or in thereafter rendering a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

¶33. Not being fully convinced that the bill of exceptions in this case was brought to this court for delay only, the request of the defendant in error that ten per cent, damages be assessed against plaintiff in error ' is denied.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.W. B. Bennel, J. B. Murrow, for plaintiff in error, cited:

¶521 Ga. App. 717; 20 Ga. App. 740.

John Henry Poole, contra, cited:

¶6108 Ga. 12-14; 112 Ga. 662; 14 Ga. App. 172 (2); 71 Ga. 470; 134 Ga. 674 (2 a), and cit.; 119 Ga. 837 (7); Civil Code (1910), §§ 4135, 4140; 77 Ga. 701 (3); 101 Ga. 39(1). As to damages for bringing the case to this court: 23 Ga. App. 273 (2); 20 Ga. App. 205; Id. 97 (5); 21 Ga. App. 100; 24 Ga. App. 244 (2), 248; 25 Ga. App. 721 (3); 27 Ga. App. 365; 2 Ga. App. 62; 6 Ga. App. 189; 7 Ga. App. 142; 8 Ga. App. 34; 18 Ga. App. 649; 19 Ga. App. 809, 811; 91 Ga. 192; 109 Ga. 172 (5).

/31/gaapp/163 · .json · Public domain