Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 Ga. App. 172

Eason v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1923

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1923-11-15

Decided 1923-11-15

Luke, J.

¶1The defendant complains that her conviction was not authorized by the evidence. The evidence was conflicting, but, the jury having believed the evidence for the State, showing her guilt, and the trial judge having approved the verdict, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial is

¶2 Affvrmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodioorlh, J., concur.
/31/gaapp/172 · .json · Public domain