¶1This is a bill by the appellant for the assignment of dower. Dower is a freehold estate. 2 Bl. Comm. 119, 129. Of an appeal from a decree in which a freehold is involved this court has no jurisdiction. The' exact case was decided in this court in 1884 in McManaman v. Blocks, 15 Ill. App. 476.
¶2In addition to this objection to the jurisdiction the appellant seeks to have a title, which is a fee simple on its face, declared to be only an incumbrance to which she shall be required to contribute. The effect of granting this relief is to destroy a freehold. In principle it is like establishing a resulting trust, a subject that pertains to the direct appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Lehman v. Rothbarth, 111 Ill. 185; see Helm v. Boyd, 124 Ill. 370, where the appeal was taken direct to the Supreme_ Court and.entertained, the object of the bill being to have a deed declared a mortgage.
¶3It is true that this litigation has, before the decision in 15 Ill. App., twice gone through this court without objection here or in the Supreme Court as to the jurisdiction of this court. Doane v. Walker, 101 Ill. 628; Walker v. Doane, 108 Ill. 236.
¶4And it is also true, that since the case in 15 Ill. App., this court, without noticing this objection, has affirmed a decree assigning dower. Reich v. Berdel, 20 Ill. App. 668. So the Supreme Court in Browning v. Harris, 99 Ill. 456, affirmed the judgment of the-Appellate Court of the fourth district, where the homestead right was the subject of litigation, and in Snell v. Snell, 128 Ill. 403, sustained their own jurisdiction of a like case on an appeal direct from the Circuit Court. Cases are not authority upon questions not made in them.
¶5The appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Pratt v. Kendig, last term.
¶6Appeal dismissed.