31 Ill. App. 3d 674 - Goode v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hoyt v. McLaughlin · 40 Ill. App. 2d 326 - Nechi v. Daley · 9 Ill. App. 3d 242 - People Ex Rel. Shell Oil Co. v. City of Chicago · 24 Ill. App. 3d 51 - Stevens v. County of Lake · 12 Ill. App. 3d 446 - Pence v. Village of Rantoul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As stated by Davis, Administrative Law, 1958, vol. 1, p. 456: ‘One who has no “right” to sell liquor in the sense that the State may prohibit the sale of liquor all together, may nevertheless have a “right” to fair treatment when state officers grant, deny, suspend, or revoke liquor licenses.’ Along the same lines, it has been reflected by judicial decision that when the liquor business is lawful, as it now is, the regulations provided therefore must be pursuant to a legitimate exercise of the State’s police power, which precludes regulation that is arbitrary and discriminatory.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.