LaPlante v. LaZear’s Empirical Analysis
1903
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2000 · most notably 144 Ind. App. 408 - COLEMAN ET UX. v. DeMoss (1969), Home Realty Co. v. Carius (1920)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Looney v. McLean · Phillips v. Library Co. · Purcell v. English · Readman v. Conway · Shipley v. Fifty Associates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The authorities are not in harmony, but the weight of them declare the rule to be that, where the landlord leases separate portions of the same building to different tenants,' and reserves under his control those parts of the building or premises used in common by all the tenants, he is under an implied obligation to use reasonable diligence to keep in a safe condition the parts over which he reserves control.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Starr v. Sperry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.