Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 INDAPP 635 - Burke v. Barrett

Burke v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1953
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1953

9 state decisions

30190319101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aspy v. Lewis · Moores v. Hare · Rumsey v. Durham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In view of these rules, there being no manifest intent to the contrary, it must be presumed that the clause ‘after the death of my wife’, used in the third item of the will, relates to the beginning of the enjoyment of the remainder, and not to the vesting of that estate. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.