Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 Ind. App. 698

Baertz v. Schmidt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1903

Indiana Court of Appeals · decided 1903-06-02

<p>From Laporte Superior Court; H. B. Tuthill, Judge.</p> <p>Action by Charles Baertz against Gustave Schmidt and another. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.</p>

Affirmed, · Decided 1903-06-02

Henley, J.

¶1The record in this case presents but one question— the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial. The motion for a new trial assigns but two causes: (1) That the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence; (2) that the verdict of the jury is contrary to law.

¶2We have carefully examined and considered the evidence, and we find upon every material point the evidence is conflicting. Under such circumstances this court will not disturb the judgment of the trial court.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/31/indapp/698 · .json · Public domain