Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 KAN 616 - Head v. Sutton

Head v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

1884

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 1946
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1946

8 state decisions

301884189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lucy v. Lucy · Rodman v. Rodman · State ex rel. Newman v. Jacobs · Hatch v. Proctor · Rattoon v. Overacker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The real estate of the intestate descended at once to his heirs, and the title thereof was vested in them subject only to the right of the administrator to sell the same for the payment of the debts in the manner prescribed by law. (Reading v. Wier, 29 Kan. 429 .) So the title to the real estate, which the heirs took by descent, entitled them to the possession of it, and they had the right to receive, as against the administrator, all the rents and profits thereof.” (p. 619.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.