Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 MICH 270 - Stewart v. Carleton

Stewart v. Carleton’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
7
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Hansen v. Stewart (1988), Gregory v. Knight (1883)

30 state decisions

80187518801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The law recognizes them.as useful assistants in doing the mechanical work of measurement and calculation, and it also allows such credit to their judgment as belongs to any experience which may give it value in cases where better means of information do not exist. But the deter- ruination of facts belongs exclusively to courts and juries.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.