Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 MICH 76 - Lockhart v. Van Alstyne

Lockhart v. Van Alstyne’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
16
states following
April 1990
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently April 1990 · most notably Mobile Co v. State of Tennessee (1894), New York Co v. Nickals (1886)

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 33 state decisions — followed in 16 states

901875188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ The statute which the plaintiff relies upon is section 1821 of Comp, Laws of 1857, which, on the neglect or re fusal of tne directors of manufacturing companies to comply with certain provisions of law regarding the filing of their articles of association, and of annual reports showing their financial condition, declares that such directors ‘ shall be jointly and severally liable in an action founded on this statute, for all the debts of such corporation contracted during the period of such neglect or refusal.’ This statute, it will be perceived, only makes the directors personally liable for ‘debts.* Liabilities of a company which may give causes of action against it and result in judgments are not within the statute unless they constitute present debts. A debt is that which one person is bound to pay to another, either presently or at some future period; something which may be the subject of a suit as a debt, and not something to which the party may be entitled as damages in consequence of a failure to perform a duty or keep an engagement. A right to a dividend from the profits of a corporation is no debt until the dividend is declared.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.