Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 MINN 103 - Mackey v. Ames

Mackey v. Ames’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
5
states following
March 1957
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1957

15 state decisions

4018831890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Tbe provision is absolute that this agreement — i. e., the whole agreement — shall be void. It is not a provision that the plaintiffs may, at their option or election, abandon or dissolve the agreement, but that it shall, upon the occurrence of the specified contingency, become void, and therefore no longer binding upon either party.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.