Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 N.C. App. 592

State v. Morrow

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1976

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1976-12-01

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2013

3 state decisions

Relies on State v. Wall · State v. Guffey · State v. Covington

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-12-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PARKER, Judge.

¶1The record shows that this case originated in the superior court upon the bill of indictment. The crime charged therein is a misdemeanor. G.S. 14-72(a). The district court has exclusive original jurisdiction of all misdemeanors except as stated in G.S. 7A-271 (a). State v. Wall, 271 N.C. 675, 157 S.E. 2d 363 (1967). None of the exceptions apply in this case. The superior court was without jurisdiction to try the defendant for the first time for the offense charged in the bill of indictment, and the judgment entered by the superior court must be arrested.

¶2It should be noted that this jurisdictional question was not raised before the able trial judge, nor was it raised in the briefs filed in this court. Nevertheless, where the lack of jurisdiction is apparent on the record, this court must note it ex mero motu. State v. Guffey, 283 N.C. 94, 194 S.E. 2d 827 (1973); State v. Covington, 267 N.C. 292, 148 S.E. 2d 138 (1966).

¶3The legal effect of arrest of judgment is to vacate the verdict and judgment. State v. Covington, supra.The defendant may still be tried in the district court for the offense charged in the bill of indictment.

¶4Judgment arrested.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Hedrick concur.
/31/ncapp/592 · .json · Public domain