¶1 delivered the opinion of the court, which held the levy to be good, and that, under the order staying proceedings, there was no abandonment of the levy.
¶2 The case is reported in 27 How. Fr., p. 47.
31 N.Y. 102
Decided January 5, 1865
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1865-01-05
In this case, the sheriff had an execution against the property of Bemsen & Dingee, and proceeded to their store, and informed them of his business, exhibited the execution, and indorsed a levy of the same upon it, while in the store. By an arrangement with one of the partners, the officer left the goods in the store until the next day, when he was served with an order staying proceedings on the execution.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1865-01-05
Cited by 7 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1965
1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.