Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Ohio App. 3d 232 - State v. Wright

31 Ohio App. 3d 232 - State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Adams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist.” R.C. 2901.22(C) defines “recklessly” as follows: "A person acts recklessly when, with heedless indifference to the consequences, he perversely disregards a known risk that his conduct is likely to cause a certain result or is likely to be of a certain nature. A person is reckless with respect to circumstances when, with heedless indifference to the consequences, he perversely disregards a known risk that such circumstances are likely to exist.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The culpable mental state of recklessness is an essential element of the crime of endangering children.” State v. Wright (1986), 31 Ohio App.3d 232, 233 , 31 OBR 515, 516, 510 N.E.2d 827, 828 . 2 . The term”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.