31 Ohio App. 3d 248 - Walkup v. Walkup’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Worthington v. Worthington · 3 Ohio App. 3d 180 - Sanzenbacher v. Sanzenbacher · Joseph v. Alexander · Lynn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Interest in the Property of the Other. Neither husband nor wife has any interest in the property of the other, except as mentioned in section 3103.03 of the Revised Code, the right to dower, and the right to remain in the mansion house after the death of either_ (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where the increase in value of non-marital property of one spouse is in no part due to the efforts of the other spouse, and neither marital funds nor labor was expended to increase the value, it is inequitable to divide the appreciation between the spouses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Britton v. Britton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.