Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Ohio App. 3d 38 - Bush v. Mayfield

31 Ohio App. 3d 38 - Bush v. Mayfield’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2006

8 state decisions

40198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) The employer, with knowledge of a claimed compensable injury or occupational disease, has paid wages in lieu of compensation for total disability. (3) In the event the employer is a self-insuring employer, one of the following has occurred: (a) Written or facsimile notice of the specific part or parts of the body claimed to have been injured has been given to the commission or bureau or the employer has furnished treatment by a licensed physician in the employ of an employer, provided, however, that the furnishing of such treatment shall not constitute a recognition of a claim as compensable, but shall do no more than satisfy the requirements of this section; (b) Compensation or benefits have been paid or furnished equal to or greater than is provided for in sections 4123.52 [etc.].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““(3) In the event the employer has elected to pay compensation or benefits directly, one of the following has occurred: “(a) Written notice of the specific part or parts of the body claimed to have been injured has been given to the commission or bureau, or the employer has furnished treatment by a licensed physician in the employ of an employer; providing, however, that the furnishing of such treatment shall not constitute a recognition of a claim as compensable, but shall do no more than satisfy the requirements of this section; “(b) Compensation or benefits have been paid or furnished equal to or greater than is provided for in sections 4123.52, 4123.55 to 4123.62, and 4123.64 to 4123.67 of the Revised Code.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.