Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 OHIOST2D 132 - Krause v. State

Krause v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

175
cited by 175 later decisions
14
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 146 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 175 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways (1978), 64 Ohio St. 3d 284 - Conley v. Shearer (1992)

21 federal appellate · 146 state decisions — followed in 14 states

470197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reed v. Reed · Tigner v. Texas · 55 Cal. 2d 211 - Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District · Holytz v. City of Milwaukee · Stone v. Arizona Highway Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(s)uits may be brought against the state, in such courts and in such manner, as may be provided by law.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'that body of law which creates, defines and regulates the rights of the parties.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The Constitutions of 1803 and 1851 were silent on the question of governmental immunity, but case law by this court clearly shows that it existed in Ohio. See State v. Franklin Bank of Columbus (1840), 10 Ohio 91 ; Miers v. Zanesville and Maysville Turnpike Co. (1842), 11 Ohio 273 ; and Seely v. State (1842), 11 Ohio 501 , affirmed, 12 Ohio 496 . Thus, the doctrine had a judicial origin. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.