Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 Okla. 5 - Hertzel v. Weber

Hertzel v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1926
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullen v. Thaxton · St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Copeland · Tays v. Carr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court, in every stage of action, must disregard any error or defect in the pleadings or proceedings which does not affect ibe substantial rights of the adverse party; and no judgment shall be reversed or affected by reason of such error or defect.” Comp. Stat. 1921. sec. 319.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Any matter which involves the individual rights of the parties to a cause may properly be made the subject of a stipulation between them. They may, by stipulation, waive the benefit of a statutory or constitutional provision, or rule of law, or irregularities, and they may agree upon the existence or truth of certain facts.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.