Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 31 OR 231 - Thompson v. Connell

Thompson v. Connell’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
3
states following
November 1976
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 1976 · most notably Nelson v. Meehan (1907), Carmichael v. Carmichael (1921)

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 31 state decisions

120189719001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. Taaffe · Craig v. Smith · White v. Northwest Stage Co. · Askren v. Squire · McIntosh v. Comm'rs of Crawford County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““So that, in either view, whether the acts complained of are such as may be denominated by one of the statutory appellations, or from their general nature and effect fall within the mischief sought to be relieved against, it is apparent that the statute is broad enough to afford ample relief by motion in the action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The court may * .* in its discretion, and upon such terms as may be just, at any time within one year after notice thereof, relieve a party from a judgment, order, or other proceeding taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Section 103, B. & C. Comp.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.