31 Or. App. 1155 - State v. Nulph’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2018
2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[T]he state should not benefit from the improper * * * inference that a defendant who invokes [his or her] right to counsel is guilty of the charged offense,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"A person commits the crime of kidnapping in the second degree if, with intent to interfere substantially with another's personal liberty, and without consent or legal authority, the person: "(a) Takes the person from one place to another[.]"”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he erroneous admission of evidence that a defendant invoked his right to counsel is not necessarily prejudicial”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.