31 Or. App. 607 - Fields v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1981
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 151 · 47 U.S.C. § 152 · 47 U.S.C. § 202 · 47 U.S.C. § 221
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(b) Subject to the provisions of section 301 of this title, nothing in this chapter shall be construed to apply, or to give the Commission jurisdiction, with respect to charges, classifications, practices, services, facilities, or regulations for or in connection with wire, mobile, or point-to-point radio telephone exchange service, or any combination thereof, even though a portion of such exchange service constitutes interstate or foreign communication, in any case where such matters are subject to regulation by a State commission or by local governmental authority." (Emphasis added.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is a clear statement that Congress did not intend to preempt state regulation of mobile carriers * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Appeal of Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.