31 Or. App. 851 - State v. Paz’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

28 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"In making determinations of whether a defendant was `in custody' for the purposes of Miranda , we have looked to at least three specific circumstances surrounding a defendant's interrogation. "First, we often examine whether the defendant could have left the scene of the interrogation voluntarily. * * * "Second, we often focus on whether the defendant was questioned by the police as a suspect or merely as a witness. * * "Finally, we look to whether a defendant freely and voluntarily accompanied police to the place of his questioning. * * *" 31 Or. App. at 860 , 572 P.2d at 1041 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 35 Or. App. 809 - State v. Mitchell

2. “the test for custodial interrogation [is] “whether the suspect is physically deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way or is placed in a situation in which he reasonably believes that his freedom of action of movement is restricted by such interrogation . .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hunter v. State

3. “"* * * questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way. * * *" 384 U.S. at 444 , 86 S.Ct. at 1612 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 35 Or. App. 809 - State v. Mitchell