Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

31 S.D. 622

Todd v. Burger

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1913

South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1913-05-24

Lion. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Action by Charles Todd against Fred P. Burger and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Appellant’s procedure on this appeal has been -so faulty that he is not entitled to have the merits of the case considered, and the judgment should be affirmed because of irregularities in procedure alone.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1914

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Doran

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1913-05-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McCOY, J.

¶1In this case there are no assignments of error contained in appellant’s brief. The record is .clearly within the rule heretofore announced by this court in State v. Doran, 28 S. D. 486, 134 N. W. 53; Dring v. St. Lawrence Tp., 140 N. W. 264; Sanford et al. v. Helgerson, 141 N. W. 390.

¶2The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

/31/sd/622 · .json · Public domain