31 So. 3d 273 - McRoy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. Feiock · 613 So. 2d 457 - Gidden v. State · 352 So. 2d 110 - Ray v. State · 150 So. 2d 231 - State v. Clemmons · 645 So. 2d 71 - Schenck v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Direct] contempt may be punished summarily if the court saw or heard the conduct constituting the contempt committed in the actual presence of the court. The judgment of guilt of contempt shall include a recital of those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based. Prior to the adjudication of guilt the court shall inform the person accused of the accusation and inquire as to whether there is any cause to show why he or she should not be adjudged guilty of contempt by the court and sentenced therefor. The accused shall be given the opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances. The judgment shall be signed by the court and entered of record. Sentence shall be pronounced in open court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. A.W. v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.