31 So. 3d 290 - Cuevas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 217 - Holly v. Auld · A. R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, as Admrx. · 934 So. 2d 1276 - V.K.E. v. State · 121 So. 2d 779 - Tropical Coach Line, Inc. v. Carter · 854 So. 2d 816 - Reyes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the Department of Corrections, the department, or any other law enforcement agency obtains information which indicates that an offender meets the sexual predator criteria but the court did not make a written finding that the offender is a sexual predator as required in paragraph (a), the Department of Corrections, the department, or the law enforcement agency shall notify the state attorney who prosecuted the offense for offenders described in subparagraph (a)1., or the state attorney of the county where the offender establishes or maintains a residence upon first entering the state for offenders described in subparagraph (a)3. The state attorney shall bring the matter to the court's attention in order to establish that the offender meets the sexual predator criteria.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. McKenzie v. State“However, [ section 775.21(5)(c) ] ... is inapplicable on its face because subparagraph (a)1 pertains only to offenders who have been civilly committed under the Jimmy Ryce Act, § 394.910, Fla. Stat. (2000), and subparagraph (a)3 pertains to persons who have committed a similar violation in another jurisdiction. By its terms, this subsection does not include offenders described in section 775.21(a) 2, the category in which Cuevas falls.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. McKenzie v. State“A careful reading of the special language applicable to the two categories ( section 775.21(5)(a) 1. and 3.) reveals that those are special notice and venue rules for those special cases, not exclusive descriptions of the only circumstances in which the State can perform its duty after the defendant is sentenced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McKenzie v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.