Bellamy v. Crosby’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Purkett v. Elem · 457 So. 2d 481 - State v. Neil · Roaquin v. Brown · Melbourne v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he trial court did not make a finding as to whether the reason offered for the strike was a pretext. Instead, it simply stated, “I have heard all of the Neil[ 1 ] challenges that have been made, and there have been race-neutral reasons given for the challenges.” It did not make the next step of going on to the third part of the analysis, determining the genuineness of the state’s reasons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Victor v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.